SIB Days 2020 - Virtual Conference - June 8, 2020

Dataset: Breast Cancer

Introduction

Welcome to the SIB Days 2020 - virtual conference Visium Spatial Transcriptomics workshop by 10x Genomics!

The purpose of this tutorial will be to walk users through some of the steps necessary to explore data produced by the 10x Genomics Visium Spatial Gene Expression Solution and the Spaceranger pipeline. We will investigate the data sets are all freely available from 10x Genomics.

This tutorial is largely an extension off of the primary Seurat Visium Tutorial

Things to know about this workshop

1. All files that will be used can be found at: /mnt/libs/shared_data/

[]

2. Getting started with R and Visium data outside of Seurat at: https://support.10xgenomics.com/spatial-gene-expression/software/pipelines/latest/rkit
3. Reference genome for all samples is GRCh38/mm10
4. All 10x software including Spaceranger, and Loupe Browser, can be downloaded from the 10x Support Site
5. Most Seurat figures can be controlled with patchwork because they are fundamentally ggplot objects. Some really nice examples can be found on the Patchwork GitHub
6. This tutoial is NOT officially supported by 10x genomics. It is simply for informative purposes and to provide the growndwork for individuals to get started with 3rd party analysis tools.

Exploring Visium Data with Seurat

Load our packages

library(Seurat)
library(ggplot2)
library(patchwork)
library(dplyr)
library(RColorBrewer)

Loading data in a Seurat object

Real Dataset for the tutorial

breast_cancer <- Load10X_Spatial(data.dir = "/mnt/libs/shared_data/human_breast_cancer_1/outs/",
                filename = "V1_Breast_Cancer_Block_A_Section_1_filtered_feature_bc_matrix.h5")

Same data just internal to 10x

breast_cancer <- Load10X_Spatial(data.dir = "/mnt/analysis/marsoc/pipestances/HWHTFDSXX/SPATIAL_RNA_COUNTER_PD/163086/HEAD/outs/", slice = "slice1")

There are a bunch of data sets hosted by the Satija lab in the Seurat Data Package.

Results

QC

Let’s have a look at some basic QC information. Keep in mind that most Seurat plots are ggplot object and can be manipulated as such.

Counts = UMI Features = Genes

plot1 <- VlnPlot(breast_cancer, features = "nCount_Spatial", pt.size = 0.1) + 
  ggtitle("UMI") +
  theme(axis.text.x = element_blank(), 
        axis.title.x = element_blank(), 
        legend.position = "right") +
  NoLegend()

plot2 <- VlnPlot(breast_cancer, features = "nFeature_Spatial", pt.size = 0.1) + 
  ggtitle("Genes") +
  theme(axis.text.x = element_blank(), 
        axis.title.x = element_blank(), 
        legend.position = "right") +
  NoLegend()

plot3 <- SpatialFeaturePlot(breast_cancer, features = "nCount_Spatial") + 
  theme(legend.position = "right")

plot4 <- SpatialFeaturePlot(breast_cancer, features = "nFeature_Spatial") +
  theme(legend.position = "right")

plot1 + plot2 + plot3  + plot4 + plot_layout(nrow = 2, ncol = 2)

Normalization

Spaceranger does normalization for clustering and DE but does not return that normalized matrix

Pre-normalization Raw UMI counts

SpatialFeaturePlot(breast_cancer, features = c("ERBB2", "CD8A"))

SE transform

• This will take ~3-4 min.

Don’t worry about reachediteration limit warnings. See https://github.com/ChristophH/sctransform/issues/25 for discussion

Default assay will now be set to SCT

breast_cancer <- SCTransform(breast_cancer, assay = "Spatial", verbose = FALSE)

SpatialFeaturePlot(breast_cancer, features = c("ERBB2", "CD8A"))

From Seurat:

The default parameters in Seurat emphasize the visualization of molecular data. However, you can also adjust the size of the spots (and their transparency) to improve the visualization of the histology image, by changing the following parameters:

pt.size.factor- This will scale the size of the spots. Default is 1.6
alpha - minimum and maximum transparency. Default is c(1, 1).
Try setting to alpha c(0.1, 1), to downweight the transparency of points with lower expression

p1 <- SpatialFeaturePlot(breast_cancer, features = "IGFBP5", pt.size.factor = 1)+ 
  theme(legend.position = "right") +
  ggtitle("Actual Spot Size")
p2 <- SpatialFeaturePlot(breast_cancer, features = "IGFBP5")+ 
  theme(legend.position = "right") +
  ggtitle("Scaled Spot Size")
p1 + p2

Dimensionality reduction, clustering, and visualization

We can then proceed to run dimensionality reduction and clustering on the RNA expression data, using the same workflow as we use for scRNA-seq analysis.

Some of these processes can be parallized please see Parallelization in Seurat for more info

The default UMAP calculation is performed with the R-based UWOT library However, you can run UMAP in python via reticulate library and umap-learn. We have found that for smaller data sets (<= 10k cells/spots) UWOT is great. For much larger data sets (100k + cells/spots) umap-learn can be a faster option.

breast_cancer <- RunPCA(breast_cancer, assay = "SCT", verbose = FALSE)
breast_cancer <- FindNeighbors(breast_cancer, reduction = "pca", dims = 1:30)

Computing nearest neighbor graph
Computing SNN

breast_cancer <- FindClusters(breast_cancer, verbose = FALSE)
breast_cancer <- RunUMAP(breast_cancer, reduction = "pca", dims = 1:30)

The default method for RunUMAP has changed from calling Python UMAP via reticulate to the R-native UWOT using the cosine metric
To use Python UMAP via reticulate, set umap.method to 'umap-learn' and metric to 'correlation'
This message will be shown once per session14:26:26 UMAP embedding parameters a = 0.9922 b = 1.112
14:26:26 Read 3822 rows and found 30 numeric columns
14:26:26 Using Annoy for neighbor search, n_neighbors = 30
14:26:26 Building Annoy index with metric = cosine, n_trees = 50
0%   10   20   30   40   50   60   70   80   90   100%
[----|----|----|----|----|----|----|----|----|----|
**************************************************|
14:26:27 Writing NN index file to temp file /tmp/RtmpTrBZqF/file780e57b16d8ce
14:26:27 Searching Annoy index using 1 thread, search_k = 3000
14:26:28 Annoy recall = 100%
14:26:28 Commencing smooth kNN distance calibration using 1 thread
14:26:29 Initializing from normalized Laplacian + noise
14:26:32 Commencing optimization for 500 epochs, with 157848 positive edges
0%   10   20   30   40   50   60   70   80   90   100%
[----|----|----|----|----|----|----|----|----|----|
**************************************************|
14:26:42 Optimization finished

Now let’s have a look at the clustering

DimPlot(breast_cancer, reduction = "umap", label = FALSE,) +
  labs(color = "Cluster")

p1 <- DimPlot(breast_cancer, reduction = "umap", label = TRUE) +
  labs(color = "Cluster")
p2 <- SpatialDimPlot(breast_cancer, label = TRUE, label.size = 3) +
  labs(fill = "Cluster")

p1 + p2 + plot_annotation(
  title = 'Clustering in UMAP and Tissue Space',
  caption = 'Processed by Spaceranger 1.1\nNormilization and Clustering by Seurat'
) + plot_layout(nrow = 1)

I don’t really like these colors so let’s change them

myPalette <- colorRampPalette(rev(brewer.pal(11, "Spectral")))

p1 <- DimPlot(breast_cancer, reduction = "umap", label = TRUE) +
  labs(color = "Cluster") + 
  scale_color_manual(values = c("#b2df8a","#e41a1c","#377eb8","#4daf4a","#ff7f00","gold", 
                               "#a65628", "#999999", "black", "pink", "purple", "brown",
                               "grey", "yellow", "green"))

p2 <- SpatialDimPlot(breast_cancer, label = TRUE, label.size = 3) +
  labs(fill = "Cluster")+ 
  scale_fill_manual(values = c("#b2df8a","#e41a1c","#377eb8","#4daf4a","#ff7f00","gold", 
                               "#a65628", "#999999", "black", "pink", "purple", "brown",
                               "grey", "yellow", "green"))

p1 + p2 + plot_annotation(
  title = 'Clustering in UMAP and Tissue Space',
  caption = 'Processed by Spaceranger 1.1\nNormilization and Clustering by Seurat'
) + plot_layout(nrow = 1)

If interested you can also now look at UMI and Gene counts per cluster as well

plot1 <- VlnPlot(breast_cancer, features = "nCount_Spatial", pt.size = 0.1) + 
  ggtitle("UMI") +
  scale_fill_manual(values = c("#b2df8a","#e41a1c","#377eb8","#4daf4a","#ff7f00","gold", 
                               "#a65628", "#999999", "black", "pink", "purple", "brown",
                               "grey", "yellow", "green"))+
  theme(axis.text.x = element_blank(), 
        axis.title.x = element_blank(), 
        legend.position = "right") +
  NoLegend()

plot2 <- VlnPlot(breast_cancer, features = "nFeature_Spatial", pt.size = 0.1) + 
  ggtitle("Genes") +
  scale_fill_manual(values = c("#b2df8a","#e41a1c","#377eb8","#4daf4a","#ff7f00","gold", 
                               "#a65628", "#999999", "black", "pink", "purple", "brown",
                               "grey", "yellow", "green"))+
  theme(axis.title.x = element_blank(), 
        legend.position = "right") +
  NoLegend()

plot1 + plot2

Now let’s take a look at at a gene of interest with violin plots but also in image space.

p1 <- VlnPlot(breast_cancer, features = "IGFBP5", pt.size = 0.1) + 
  ggtitle("IGFBP5") +
  scale_fill_manual(values = c("#b2df8a","#e41a1c","#377eb8","#4daf4a","#ff7f00","gold", 
                               "#a65628", "#999999", "black", "pink", "purple", "brown",
                               "grey", "yellow", "green"))+
  theme(axis.title.x = element_blank(), 
        legend.position = "right") +
  NoLegend() +
  stat_summary(fun=mean, geom="point", shape=23, size=4, color="red")

p2 <- SpatialFeaturePlot(breast_cancer, features = "IGFBP5")+ 
  theme(legend.position = "right")

CombinePlots is being deprecated. Plots should now be combined using the patchwork system.

p3 <- SpatialDimPlot(breast_cancer, label = TRUE, label.size = 3) +
  labs(fill = "Cluster")+ 
  scale_fill_manual(values = c("#b2df8a","#e41a1c","#377eb8","#4daf4a","#ff7f00","gold", 
                               "#a65628", "#999999", "black", "pink", "purple", "brown",
                               "grey", "yellow", "green")) +
  NoLegend()

CombinePlots is being deprecated. Plots should now be combined using the patchwork system.

row1 <- p2 + p3 + plot_layout(nrow = 1)
row1 + p1+ plot_layout(nrow = 2, widths = c(0.5, 0.5))

We can also look at these data interactively

LinkedDimPlot(breast_cancer)

Spatially variable features

First we’ll identify deferentially expressed genes (parallelization can help here).

Let’s find all the markers for every cluster

Identify the most up-regulated and down-regulated genes

de_markers_up <- de_markers %>%
  tibble::rownames_to_column(var = "Gene") %>% 
  arrange(-avg_logFC)

de_markers_down <- de_markers %>%
  tibble::rownames_to_column(var = "Gene") %>% 
  arrange(avg_logFC)

Most up-regulated genes

SpatialFeaturePlot(object = breast_cancer, features = de_markers_up$Gene[1:10], alpha = c(0.1, 1), ncol = 3)

Most down-regulated genes

SpatialFeaturePlot(object = breast_cancer, features = de_markers_down$Gene[1:10], alpha = c(0.1, 1), ncol = 3)

what are the top variable features?

VariableFeatures(breast_cancer)[1:10]

 [1] "IGKC"   "IGHG3"  "IGLC2"  "MGP"    "ALB"    "IGHG1"  "CPB1"   "CRISP3" "IGLC3"  "IGHM"  

what are the top DE genes?

rownames(de_markers)[1:10]

 [1] "CRISP3"  "IGFBP5"  "SLITRK6" "H3F3A"   "IGFBP4"  "MALAT1"  "C3"      "KRT18"   "S100A11" "MGP"    

Spatially Variable Genes

So what about spatial enrichment?

Some methods

1. Trendsceek
2. Splotch
3. SPARK
4. SpatialDE

• We have found this implementation not to be very effective. It’s also not under active development

Using the top 100 variable genes find spatially enriched ones. Note that in the Seurat Spatial Tutorial they use 1000 genes. You can also use all genes but that will take a long time. Using a calculation of Morans I can sometimes be a faster approach, especially if you are using parallization.

breast_cancer <- FindSpatiallyVariableFeatures(breast_cancer, 
                                               assay = "SCT", 
                                               slot = "scale.data", 
                                               features = VariableFeatures(breast_cancer)[1:100],
                                               selection.method = "markvariogram", verbose = TRUE)

Have a look at the spatially variable genes calculated by markvariogram ordered from most variable to least variable

SpatiallyVariableFeatures(breast_cancer, selection.method = "markvariogram", decreasing = TRUE)

  [1] "CRISP3"     "CXCL14"     "MGP"        "CPB1"       "COX6C"      "SLITRK6"    "TTLL12"     "CCND1"      "MALAT1"    
 [10] "AGR2"       "ALB"        "GFRA1"      "S100G"      "CSTA"       "DEGS1"      "TFF3"       "MT-ND1"     "IGLC2"     
 [19] "MT-CO1"     "IGHG3"      "CD74"       "C6orf141"   "S100A6"     "MT-ND2"     "TFF1"       "IGKC"       "IGHG1"     
 [28] "APOE"       "ZNF350-AS1" "HLA-DRA"    "AC087379.2" "IGHG4"      "C3"         "FCGR3B"     "TIMP1"      "LINC00645" 
 [37] "IGHM"       "SCGB2A2"    "KRT14"      "IGLC3"      "KRT17"      "LYZ"        "APOC1"      "SCGB1D2"    "IGHA1"     
 [46] "C1QA"       "AEBP1"      "APOD"       "KRT5"       "MMP7"       "CCL19"      "COL6A2"     "TAGLN"      "S100A9"    
 [55] "IGHG2"      "COL1A2"     "DCN"        "SPP1"       "COL1A1"     "CGA"        "VIM"        "IGFBP7"     "FN1"       
 [64] "CCDC80"     "CXCL9"      "IGHA2"      "TRBC2"      "SFRP2"      "KRT6B"      "S100A2"     "LUM"        "COL3A1"    
 [73] "IGLC7"      "SAA1"       "CARTPT"     "COMP"       "JCHAIN"     "CST1"       "PTGDS"      "SFRP4"      "CD79A"     
 [82] "CCL21"      "FABP4"      "MUC19"      "ACKR1"      "POSTN"      "MMP9"       "S100A7"     "VWF"        "AQP1"      
 [91] "CLDN5"      "ACTA2"      "MS4A1"      "IGLL5"      "MYH11"      "CXCL10"     "IGHD"       "HBB"        "TPSB2"     
[100] "AC005224.3"

top.features_trendseq <- head(SpatiallyVariableFeatures(breast_cancer, selection.method = "markvariogram"), 8)
SpatialFeaturePlot(breast_cancer, features = top.features_trendseq, ncol = 4, alpha = c(0.1, 1))

Moran’s I implementation. For other spatial data types the x.cuts and y.cuts determines the grid that is laid over the tissue in the capture area. Here we’ll remove those

breast_cancer <- FindSpatiallyVariableFeatures(breast_cancer, 
                                               assay = "SCT", 
                                               slot = "scale.data", 
                                               features = VariableFeatures(breast_cancer)[1:100],
                                               selection.method = "moransi")

Computing Moran's I

Have a look at the spatially variable genes calculated by moransi ordered from most variable to least variable

SpatiallyVariableFeatures(breast_cancer, selection.method = "moransi", decreasing = TRUE)

  [1] "CRISP3"     "CXCL14"     "TTLL12"     "SLITRK6"    "GFRA1"      "CCND1"      "AGR2"       "COX6C"      "MGP"       
 [10] "ALB"        "MALAT1"     "CPB1"       "DEGS1"      "C6orf141"   "CSTA"       "MT-ND1"     "TFF3"       "MT-CO1"    
 [19] "S100A6"     "MT-ND2"     "LINC00645"  "FCGR3B"     "S100G"      "TFF1"       "C3"         "ZNF350-AS1" "HLA-DRA"   
 [28] "CD74"       "SCGB1D2"    "APOD"       "IGLC2"      "TIMP1"      "IGHG3"      "SCGB2A2"    "APOC1"      "KRT14"     
 [37] "LYZ"        "CCDC80"     "APOE"       "TAGLN"      "IGHG1"      "AC087379.2" "CCL19"      "SPP1"       "IGKC"      
 [46] "S100A9"     "KRT17"      "IGHM"       "FN1"        "KRT5"       "IGFBP7"     "C1QA"       "COL6A2"     "AQP1"      
 [55] "CXCL9"      "ACKR1"      "CARTPT"     "DCN"        "AEBP1"      "IGLC3"      "IGHG4"      "VIM"        "S100A2"    
 [64] "IGHG2"      "MMP7"       "IGHA1"      "CCL21"      "KRT6B"      "TRBC2"      "COL1A2"     "CGA"        "SFRP2"     
 [73] "VWF"        "COL1A1"     "SAA1"       "MUC19"      "COL3A1"     "CLDN5"      "SFRP4"      "POSTN"      "PTGDS"     
 [82] "IGHA2"      "JCHAIN"     "CD79A"      "ACTA2"      "LUM"        "CST1"       "S100A7"     "COMP"       "MS4A1"     
 [91] "IGLC7"      "MMP9"       "HBB"        "FABP4"      "MYH11"      "IGLL5"      "CXCL10"     "TPSB2"      "IGHD"      
[100] "AC005224.3"

top.features_moransi <- head(SpatiallyVariableFeatures(breast_cancer, selection.method = "moransi"), 8)
SpatialFeaturePlot(breast_cancer, features = top.features_moransi, ncol = 4, alpha = c(0.1, 1))

We can see that the results are slightly different. So let’s take a look at why.

spatially_variable_genes <- breast_cancer@assays$SCT@meta.features %>%
  tidyr::drop_na()

spatially_variable_genes

You can see the two methods show

mm_cor <- cor.test(spatially_variable_genes$moransi.spatially.variable.rank, spatially_variable_genes$markvariogram.spatially.variable.rank)
ggplot(spatially_variable_genes, aes(x=moransi.spatially.variable.rank,y=markvariogram.spatially.variable.rank))+
  geom_point()+
  geom_smooth()+
  xlab("Morans I Rank")+
  ylab("Markvariogram Rank")+
  annotate("text", x = 25, y = 75, label = paste("Pearson's Correlation\n", round(mm_cor$estimate[1], digits = 2), sep = ""))+
  theme_bw()

Cancer annotations

Where are these genes being expressed relative to pathologist annotation?

ca <- readbitmap::read.bitmap("images/Breast Cancer Path.png")
# in the tutorial
# ca <- readbitmap::read.bitmap('/mnt/libs/shared_data/human_breast_cancer_1/images/Breast_Cancer_Path.png')
plot(0:1,0:1,type="n",ann=FALSE,axes=FALSE)
rasterImage(ca,0,0,1,1)

Looks like the Matrix Gla protein ( MGP ) gene is enriched in Ductal Carcinoma In Situ. Not a lot is known about MGP in the context of cancer but it looks like it could be an interesting novel gene to investigate with regard to Ductal Carcinoma In Situ.

SpatialFeaturePlot(object = breast_cancer, features = "MGP", alpha = c(0.1, 1), ncol = 3)

Multiple Sections

for workshop

breast_cancer_2 <- Load10X_Spatial(data.dir = "/mnt/libs/shared_data/human_breast_cancer_2/outs/",
                filename = "V1_Breast_Cancer_Block_A_Section_2_filtered_feature_bc_matrix.h5")

for 10x

breast_cancer_2 <- Load10X_Spatial(data.dir = "/mnt/analysis/marsoc/pipestances/HWHTFDSXX/SPATIAL_RNA_COUNTER_PD/163087/HEAD/outs/", 
                                   slice = "slice2")

breast_cancer_merged <- merge(breast_cancer, breast_cancer_2)

Some cell names are duplicated across objects provided. Renaming to enforce unique cell names.

Counts = UMI Features = Genes

plot1 <- SpatialFeaturePlot(breast_cancer_merged, features = "nCount_Spatial") + 
  theme(legend.position = "right")

plot2 <- SpatialFeaturePlot(breast_cancer_merged, features = "nFeature_Spatial") +
  theme(legend.position = "right")

plot1 + plot2 + plot_layout(nrow = 2)

Normalize merged data

This will take ~3min

Default assay will now be set to SCT

breast_cancer_merged <- SCTransform(breast_cancer_merged, assay = "Spatial", verbose = TRUE)

SpatialFeaturePlot(breast_cancer_merged, features = c("ERBB2", "CD8A"))

Single cell/nuclei integration

Here we have a preprocessed Seurat object with 10k nuclei annotated from a breast cancer sample. Don’t bother too much with the details of how this data was generated they don’t particularly matter for our purposes.

Load the Seurat object

10x infrastructure

bc_snRNA <- readRDS("/mnt/home/stephen.williams/yard/Odin/SIB_2020_Workshop/bc_snRNA.rds")

For the workshop

bc_snRNA <- readRDS("/mnt/libs/shared_data/bc_snRNA.rds")

bc_snRNA

An object of class Seurat 
56988 features across 10000 samples within 2 assays 
Active assay: SCT (23450 features)
 1 other assay present: RNA
 3 dimensional reductions calculated: pca, harmony, umap

It’s always a good idea to rerun normalization to make sure your data is in the correct format before moving forward with integration. We’ve already preprocessed this dataset.

bc_snRNA <- SCTransform(bc_snRNA, ncells = 3000, verbose = FALSE) %>% 
  RunPCA(verbose = FALSE) %>% 
  RunUMAP(dims = 1:30)

Class

Subclass

snRNA Differentially Expressed Genes

What genes define some cell types?

# Find markers for every cluster compared to all remaining cells, report only the positive ones
# This takes a bit of time so we'll skip it and move on to specific cell types
de_markers_snRNA <- FindAllMarkers(bc_snRNA, only.pos = TRUE, min.pct = 0.25, logfc.threshold = 0.25)
de_markers_snRNA %>% 
  group_by(cluster) %>% 
  top_n(n = 2, wt = avg_logFC)

Find markers that define tumors

Find markers that define tumors

Find markers that define stem cells

Identify and Transfer Anchors

anchors <- FindTransferAnchors(reference = bc_snRNA, query = breast_cancer,normalization.method = "SCT")

predictions.assay <- TransferData(anchorset = anchors, refdata = bc_snRNA$subclass, prediction.assay = TRUE, 
    weight.reduction = breast_cancer[["pca"]])

breast_cancer[["predictions"]] <- predictions.assay

DefaultAssay(breast_cancer) <- "predictions"

Let’s have a look at our annotations again.

ca <- readbitmap::read.bitmap("images/Breast Cancer Path.png")
# in the tutorial
# ca <- readbitmap::read.bitmap('/mnt/libs/shared_data/human_breast_cancer_1/images/Breast_Cancer_Path.png')
plot(0:1,0:1,type="n",ann=FALSE,axes=FALSE)
rasterImage(ca,0,0,1,1)

Immune Microenvironment

T cell subtypes

NOTE we’ll work with subclass but if we wanted to work with class do……..

What about the immune microenvironment?

Ducal Carcinoma in situ is depleted of T-cells

(SpatialFeaturePlot(breast_cancer, 
                   features = c("T cells-0"), 
                   pt.size.factor = 1.5, ncol = 2, crop = TRUE) |
SpatialFeaturePlot(breast_cancer, 
                   features = c("T cells-1"), 
                   pt.size.factor = 1.5, ncol = 2, crop = TRUE)) /
(SpatialFeaturePlot(breast_cancer, 
                   features = c("T cells-2"), 
                   pt.size.factor = 1.5, ncol = 2, crop = TRUE) |
SpatialFeaturePlot(breast_cancer, 
                   features = c("T cells-5"), 
                   pt.size.factor = 1.5, ncol = 2, crop = TRUE))

B cell subtypes

B cells are enriched in the fibrous tissue outside the tumor

SpatialFeaturePlot(breast_cancer, 
                   features = c("B cells"), 
                   pt.size.factor = 1.5, ncol = 2, crop = TRUE)

There seem to be some ductal cells but have a look at our score. Are we confident in this assertion?

SpatialFeaturePlot(breast_cancer, 
                   features = c("Ductal cells"), 
                   pt.size.factor = 1.5,  crop = TRUE)

Tumor Subtypes

It looks like the ducal carcinoma in situ is enriched for tumor subtypes 8, 10, and 12 but not 3.

(SpatialFeaturePlot(breast_cancer, 
                   features = c("Tumor cells-3"), 
                   pt.size.factor = 1.5, ncol = 2, crop = TRUE) |
SpatialFeaturePlot(breast_cancer, 
                   features = c("Tumor cells-8"), 
                   pt.size.factor = 1.5, ncol = 2, crop = TRUE)) /
(SpatialFeaturePlot(breast_cancer, 
                   features = c("Tumor cells-10"), 
                   pt.size.factor = 1.5, ncol = 2, crop = TRUE) |
SpatialFeaturePlot(breast_cancer, 
                   features = c("Tumor cells-12"), 
                   pt.size.factor = 1.5, ncol = 2, crop = TRUE))

Like the Ductal Cells, we might not be as confident in the Tumor Stem Cells but this might make sense considering the 10x snRNA dataset and the Visium dataset are from different individuals.

SpatialFeaturePlot(breast_cancer, 
                   features = c("CD49f-hi MaSCs"), 
                   pt.size.factor = 1.5,crop = TRUE) + 
plot_annotation(
  title = 'Tumor Stem Cells')

---

1. 10x Genomics, patrick.roelli@10xgenomics.com ↩︎

2. 10x Genomics, stefania.giacomello@10xgenomics.com↩︎

3. 10x Genomics, stephen.williams@10xgenomics.com↩︎